The Directory contains a wide variety of tools-encompassing different outcome areas, focusing on varying stages of change, and using differing methods and sources for gathering information. When considering the many tools available, take your time and be thoughtful. Just because a tool matches your outcome area of interest does not mean it is the right tool for you. For more help in finding the right tool, go to Finding a Good Fit Tool. This guide draws on workshop materials to provide you with reflection questions and suggestions to focus on how tools fit the purpose and audience of your measurement plan, your agency's capacity, and the youth in your programs.
Ask yourself the following questions:
The Directory is a searchable database containing detailed descriptions of 46 tested tools that are available to programs in 11 youth outcome areas. The table shows the 11 outcome areas and examples of elements of the outcome area that tools might measure.
| Outcome Area | Measures related to this outcome might examine: |
| Academic Skills | If your program is intentionally designed to promote the acquisition of specific and measurable academic skills, you are encouraged to work collaboratively with your local school system to coordinate testing efforts. In addition, you can find numerous academic measures through resources listed under 'Where can I go for more specific academic evaluation tools?'. |
| Adult Youth Relationships |
|
| Assets/Resiliency |
|
| Emotional Well Being |
|
| Healthy Lifestyles |
|
| Leadership Skills |
|
| Learning Orientation |
|
| Peer Relationships/Social Competence |
|
| Positive Behavior |
|
| Problem Solving/Decision Making |
|
| Self Concept |
|
Features of the tool:
Usage guidelines:
Identifying and Contact information:
It offers newly available tools and up-to-date information.
The Directory includes several tools that have been used in large scale after
school evaluations but have not been easily available -- until now. It also
offers up-to-date pricing, contacts and background on each tool, including
information that may NOT be available on product web sites!
It provides a wide variety of tools to choose from.
The variety of tools in the Directory gives programs many choices for finding
measures that meet their needs, interests and resources. For instance:
It gives you lots of ways to search and compare tools.
The Directory has been structured so that you can browse all tools or search by
outcome area or age groups. It includes a brief summary as well as a
full-length profile of each tool that meets your search criteria.
It's not a recommended list of tools.
All tools listed in this directory were found to meet certain selection
criteria (see Selection Criteria). However, it is important to note that the
directory is not a recommended list of tools. Only you can decide if a tool is
right for you.
It's not a guide to program quality assessment.
While several of the tools listed in this directory also examine aspects of
program quality, the Directory was not intended to be a resource for quality
assessment tools. For a guide to Quality Assessment tools, see "Measuring Youth
Outcome Program Quality: A Guide to Assessment Tools" published by the Forum
for Youth Investment, Impact Strategies. http://www.forumfyi.org/. See also,
www.gse.harvard.edu/hfrp/projects/afterschool/conference/
It's not a guide to family, community-level outcomes.
The purpose of the UMMB Directory was to identify tools that measure YOUTH
outcomes-not family outcomes, or community-level outcomes.
It's not a "How to Measure Outcomes" guide.
The Directory gives information about measurement tools, not how to develop or
use outcome measurement systems. Information related to designing and
conducting an outcome evaluation can be found in FAQ What resources
can I use to get ready for outcomes evaluation?
It's not a collection of ACTUAL tools.
The Directory includes detailed DESCRIPTIONS of tools-not copies of the tools
themselves. To preview or obtain copies of tools, you can click on the website
hyperlink provided or you can call the source of the tool using the information
provided.
Changes to tool wording, ratings and scales
Every tool listed in the Directory has undergone field, reliability or validity
testing. This means that tremendous effort, care, and testing has gone into the
exact wording of questions, the options for responding or rating those
questions, and decisions about which sets of questions measure which outcomes
(scales). NEVER change the wording of any question, the rating options or add/
eliminate any questions from a scale unless there are instructions that
specifically tell you that this is allowed.
If a list of items/questions are said to be part of a "scale", "sub-scale" or
"item-set", then ALWAYS use ALL items/questions in that scale must be used
together. Do not use single items from any measure unless instructions
indicate that it is OK to do so.
Instruments from publishing companies
If you purchase a tool from a publishing house, then most likely copyright laws
protect the survey. This means that you may NOT alter the survey in any way or
even reproduce the survey in whole or part WITHOUT explicit written permission
from the publisher. Feel free to use the contact information in the profile to
ask questions.
Using individual scales from a survey
Many tools are comprised of multiple scales (i.e. sets of questions). In many
cases, it is fine to use a single scale. In fact, when a survey has been
designed to measure multiple outcomes, usually you can simply pick and choose
which outcome--and therefore, which scales-- to use. In other words, you don't
have to use the whole survey. However, a tool designed to focus on a single
outcome, (e.g. leadership), may contain several sub-scales that are designed to
work together to provide you with a comprehensive picture of that one outcome
area (e.g.sub scales might be: sets personal goals, challenges themselves leads
others, and stands up for their beliefs). For single outcome tools, it is
usually advisable to use all sub-scales.
Acknowledging your source
In cases where you are constructing your own survey using available scales, you
will ALWAYS need to acknowledge your source/s in your printed surveys and in
any reporting of results.
For example, you would include the following as a footnote:
This survey was adapted from the youth outcome measures developed by Drs. Bill
Peterson and Allison Titcomb, for Prepared and Engaged Youth Serving American
Communities: A National 4-H Impact Assessment Project. (2001), University of
Arizona Institute for Children, Youth and Families.
Please see the "Instructions for Credits and Acknowledgements" section of your selected tool to be sure you are using the correct wording.
Instructions that accompany the tool
If you have important questions about alternate uses or aspects of use that are
not covered in the instructions, you should contact the publisher, researcher
or organization that developed the tool. Contact information is included in the
profiles.
To be considered for the Directory, tools had to meet the following selection criteria:
In addition, tools meet at least one of the following preferred criteria:
UNITED WAY has had a long-term interest in increasing the focus on measuring benefits to program participants. We believe what organizations learn from measurement can help improve programs, communicate their value to supporters, and enhance benefits for youth. With this Directory, we hope to encourage agencies to use research-based tools when measuring outcomes, both to enhance confidence in the results and to focus attention on those outcomes that are known to be important for youth development.
By their nature, the tools in this Directory focus on quantitative results. Qualitative approaches that derive data from observations, interviews, or verbal interactions and focus on the meanings and interpretations of the participants are valuable in their own right and can also be important complements to quantitative approaches.
Our work on the Directory began with an analysis of information about the outcomes of UNITED WAY affiliates' youth programs. We also scanned the standardized tools affiliates currently use to identify the outcomes each tool addresses. We concluded that a short list of key outcomes could meet the needs of many programs, and that there are available research-based tools that address these outcomes.
We hope the Directory will also be a vehicle through which funders of youth programs can focus their attention on those outcomes that sound research identifies as being most clearly associated with positive results. By working collaboratively with a variety of funders, we hope to simplify the messages programs receive about measurement and expand the resources available to them.
A comprehensive scan of available measures in 11 youth outcome areas was conducted during the fall of 2005. Key sources for the scan were in education, psychology, youth development and after-school such as:
The following resources yielded several appropriate tools that are included in the UWMB Guide to Youth Outcome Measures. Readers may want to consult these resources themselves when seeking other measurement instruments that fit their needs. This list is not a recommendation of the following sites, nor is it meant to be comprehensive.
Training materials developed by UNITED WAY are available on our website. This list includes assorted guides, other websites, and publications that may be useful to readers who want to learn more about evaluating youth outcomes.
Chinman, Matthew, Pamela Imm, and Abraham Wandersman. "Getting to Outcomes
2004: Promoting Accountability through Methods and Tools for Planning,
Implementation, and Evaluation." 2004. RAND Corporation.
www.rand.org/publications/TR/TR101
Curnan, S P., and L A. Cava. "Getting Ready for Outcome Evaluation: Developing
a Logic Model." Community Youth Development Journal (2001).
www.cydjournal.org/2000Winter/hughes_S1.html
"Evaluation Forum." A list of evaluation resources/publications.
http://www.evaluationforum.com/publications
Hatry, H, J Cowan, and M Hendricks. "Analyzing Outcome Information." 2003. The
Urban Institute. 2003
www.urban.org/publications/310973.html
Harvard Family Research Project . Site includes multiple resources available
related to after school evaluation. Visit address below or call (617) 495-8594.
http://www.gse.harvard.edu/hfrp
Little, P, S Dupree , and S Deich. "Documenting Progress and Demonstrating
Results: Evaluating Local Out-of-School Time Programs." 2002. Harvard Family
Research Project and the Finance Project.
http://www.hfrp.org or
www.financeproject.org
"Measuring Program Outcomes: A Practical Approach." United Way of America .
1996.
701 North Fairfax St. Alexandria , Virginia 22314 . 800-772-0008. Item # 0989.
"Outcome Measurement Resource Network." United Way of America . 800-772-0008.
national.unitedway.org/outcomes/resources/What/OM_What.cfm
"Out-of-School Time Clearinghouse: Measuring and Using Results." The Finance
Project. See Other Resources. Includes publications and evaluation tool kits.
http://www.financeproject.org/irc/ost/measuring.asp
"Out-of-School Time Program Evaluation: Tools for Action." 2003. Northwest
Regional Educational Laboratory. Item #W2462.
www.nwrel.org/ecc/21century/publications/ost-tools.pdf
Weiss, C H. Evaluation. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River , New Jersey : Prentice Hall, 1998.
There are literally thousands of tools available to assess changes in youth academic skills. The list of resources below includes a few sources to get you started. After school and other youth serving programs interested in assessing academic skills are strongly encouraged to contact their local school system in order to coordinate testing efforts.
Publishers:
American Guidance Services (AGS)
www.agsnet.com
800-328-2560 651-287-7220
CTB
www.ctb.com
800-538-9547
831-393-0700
Harcourt Assessment
www.harcourtassessment.com
800-211-8378
McGraw Hill
www.mheducation.com/div_assessment
800-262-4729
Pearson Learning Group
www.pearsonlearning.com/dra
800-526-9907
Pro Ed Publishers
www.proedinc.com
800-897-3202
Riverside
www.riverpub.com
800-323-9540
Western Psychological Services (WPS)
www.wpspublish.com
800-648-8857
310-478-2061
Reviews & Listings of Assessment Tools (including academic
assessment)
Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
buros.unl.edu/buros
Educational Testing Service.
www.ets.org.
Maddox, Taddy. "Tests, Fifth Edition:
A Comprehensive Reference for Assessments in Psychology, Education and
Business." 2003. Pro-Ed.
www.proedinc.com
Some Other Resources for Academic Assessment in Afterschool:
Assess 21 . 2004. Partnership for 21st Century Skills.
www.21stcenturyskills.org/assess21.
National Partnership for Quality Afterschool Learning . Southwest Educational
Development Laboratory.
www.sedl.org/afterschool
United Way wishes to thank Wendy Surr and Beth M. Miller of Miller Surr Research Associates who helped design the Directory, conducted the research, and provided invaluable advice about its format and use. We would also like to thank and acknowledge the many researchers and others who helped make the Directory possible through providing background information and/or generously making their tools more accessible to youth serving programs. Finally, special thanks goes to Joan Huang and Piri Miller, research assistants, who helped conduct research and collect detailed information on hundreds of measurement tools.